Abstract
This study revisits the winner’s curse hypothesis in Hong Kong’s Growth Enterprise Market, examining how public retail participation is associated with IPO first-day returns from 1999 to 2023. IPOs allocated through placement-only and placement plus sale methods deliver extraordinary first-day returns of 200.9% and 231.0%, while those with public subscription dropped to 32.5% and 10.5%. Regression analysis further confirms the negative correlation between retail allocation and first-day returns. The study also underscores policy implications of the 2018 reforms mandating at least 10% public allocation, which coincide with, and may have contributed to, the sharp decline in the number of Hong Kong’s GEM IPOs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 158 |
| Journal | International Journal of Financial Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- GEM (growth enterprise market)
- IPO (initial public offering)
- allocation methods
- first-day return
- winner’s curse
- Hong Kong stocks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Winner’s Curse Reloaded: How Public Subscription Affects IPO First-Day Returns on Hong Kong’s Growth Enterprise Market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver