The right of abode issue: Its implication on translation

Emily Poon Wai-Yee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the limitations on legal translation strategy by looking at the right of abode issue in Hong Kong - the very first case in which the role of interpretation was argued since the return of sovereignty to China in 1997. The different approaches to interpreting the mini-constitution, the Basic Law, by the Court of Final Appeal, the Hong Kong Government and the Central Authorities as well as public opinion on the issue will leave translators with no choice but to translate a text that carries terms with open interpretation as literally as possible so as not to affect the substance of the original text. This paper also discusses the strategy of translating a judgement made by a legal body. Legal bilingualism should enable the general public to understand the law to a greater extent than they previously did. A user-friendly approach to translation will accelerate the assimilation of the common law into the Chinese culture and language.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-224
Number of pages14
JournalMeta
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Abode issue
  • Chinese culture
  • Hong Kong
  • Translation of judgements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The right of abode issue: Its implication on translation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this