The functional living index-cancer is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese cancer patients

Daniel Y.T. Fong, Alvina H.K. Lee, Stewart Y. Tung, Janet Y.H. Wong, Y. M. Chan, Cynthia R. Goh, Y. B. Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the linguistic and psychometric properties of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) in assessing the quality of life of Chinese cancer patients. Methods: The English FLIC was translated into Traditional Chinese by the standard forward-backward procedure. After cognitive debriefing, a Traditional Chinese FLIC was administered to 500 cancer patients in a major public hospital in Hong Kong. Of which, 200 were invited to complete the questionnaire in 2 weeks. To identify a scale structure appropriate to Chinese, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on two randomly split halves of the sample. Results: We identified five scales of the Traditional Chinese FLIC which assess the physical, psychological, hardship, nausea and social aspects. These five scales and the overall scale demonstrated satisfactory fit and had the alpha coefficient ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. The intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.67 to 0.88. In addition, all FLIC scales were negatively associated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and, also except for the psychological scale, had lower scores in patients who were treated by chemotherapy. Conclusions: The Traditional Chinese FLIC is an appropriate health indicator for Chinese cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-316
Number of pages6
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Chinese
  • FLIC
  • Psychometric
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The functional living index-cancer is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this