Abstract
While credible sources are generally viewed as vaccines, they can also act as vectors of misinformation. However, the impact of their endorsement or debunking on user stance and echo chamber dynamics remains unclear. This study analyzes cross-sectional data from the Jiang Ping incident, a nationwide misinformation case in Chinese OSNs, to examine how credible sources influence user polarization and echo chambers over time. We assess their dual role in amplifying and correcting misinformation by tracking changes in stance polarity and interaction patterns across time windows. As the first empirical study of a credible-source misinformation event on this scale, this study offers new insights into the dynamics of credible-source misinformation and contribute to ongoing discussions on platform governance and media literacy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Informations Systems (ICIS 2025) |
| Place of Publication | USA |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Credibility Dilemma in OSNs: Credible Sources as Both Vector and Vaccine for Misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver