The Contemporary culture of blame and the fetishization of the modernist mentality

Raymond W.K. Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, a culture of blame has arisen in certain economically advanced societies that rules out the unexpected mishap. Its nature is theorized with reference to Mary Douglas's blame theory. A genealogy of the modern concept of accident shows that the conceptual distinction between the foreseeable and the unforeseeable becomes meaningful under a secular cosmology. Since contemporary society is secular, how the culture of blame is able, despite this meaningfulness, to delegitimize the unexpected is analysed by tracing it to the modernist mentality itself. Why the culture of blame has arisen is shown by tracing its emergence to neoliberalism's ascendance. By showing, with reference to Garfinkel and others, why the unexpected is intrinsic to social life, and by combining the lay and Marxist meanings of the term fetishism, it is explained why the culture of blame's mentality constitutes a fetishization of the modernist mentality. Illustrative cases are given. The culture of blame's implications for understanding contemporary modernity vis-a-vis Giddens', Beck's and Bauman's theories are discussed. The entrenchedness of the culture of blame is examined from a discursive angle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-683
Number of pages23
JournalCurrent Sociology
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2009

Keywords

  • Accident
  • Culture of blame
  • Individualization
  • Modernist mentality
  • Modernity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Contemporary culture of blame and the fetishization of the modernist mentality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this