TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting suitable passive design strategies for residential high-rise buildings in tropical climates to minimize building energy demand
AU - Perera, Udara Sachinthana
AU - Weerasuriya, A. U.
AU - Zhang, Xuelin
AU - Ruparathna, R.
AU - Tharaka, M. G.I.
AU - Lewangamage, C. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Passive design strategies (PDS) are a fitting solution to reduce the ever-growing energy cost of residential high-rise buildings in tropical regions. However, PDSs’ building energy saving potential significantly varies with local climate conditions, but it has been sparsely investigated. Hence, this study investigated the energy-saving efficiency of eight common PDSs integrated into a typical residential high-rise building in three sub-climates: extremely hot humid (0 A), very hot humid (1 A), and warm humid (3 A) defined by ASHRAE for the tropical climate. This study developed a Building Performance Analysis (BPA) workflow with a BIM-based simulation framework and local and global sensitivity analyses for the building energy analysis. The global sensitivity analysis revealed that low e-coating on glasses is the most influential PDS for 0 A and 1 A climates, but it has a negative effect in the sub-climate zone 3 A. The low-conducting exterior walls are the most effective PDS in the sub-climate zone 3 A, but they are poorly performed in the other two sub-climate zones. Based on the energy calculation and sensitivity analysis, this study proposes the best PDS groups, saving up to 40.1 %, 63.5 %, and 31.7 % of average annual building consumption in the sub-climate zones, 0 A, 1 A, and 3 A climates.
AB - Passive design strategies (PDS) are a fitting solution to reduce the ever-growing energy cost of residential high-rise buildings in tropical regions. However, PDSs’ building energy saving potential significantly varies with local climate conditions, but it has been sparsely investigated. Hence, this study investigated the energy-saving efficiency of eight common PDSs integrated into a typical residential high-rise building in three sub-climates: extremely hot humid (0 A), very hot humid (1 A), and warm humid (3 A) defined by ASHRAE for the tropical climate. This study developed a Building Performance Analysis (BPA) workflow with a BIM-based simulation framework and local and global sensitivity analyses for the building energy analysis. The global sensitivity analysis revealed that low e-coating on glasses is the most influential PDS for 0 A and 1 A climates, but it has a negative effect in the sub-climate zone 3 A. The low-conducting exterior walls are the most effective PDS in the sub-climate zone 3 A, but they are poorly performed in the other two sub-climate zones. Based on the energy calculation and sensitivity analysis, this study proposes the best PDS groups, saving up to 40.1 %, 63.5 %, and 31.7 % of average annual building consumption in the sub-climate zones, 0 A, 1 A, and 3 A climates.
KW - Building information modelling
KW - Energy simulation
KW - Passive design strategy
KW - Residential high-rise building
KW - Tropical climate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206832342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112177
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112177
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85206832342
SN - 0360-1323
VL - 267
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
M1 - 112177
ER -