TY - JOUR
T1 - Processing focus in native and non-native speakers of English
T2 - An eye-tracking study in the visual world paradigm
AU - Ge, Haoyan
AU - Mulders, Iris
AU - Kang, Xin
AU - Chen, Aoju
AU - Yip, Virginia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - This visual-world eye-tracking study investigated the processing of focus in English sentences with preverbal only by L2 learners whose L1 was either Cantonese or Dutch, compared to native speakers of English. Participants heard only-sentences with prosodic prominence either on the object or on the verb and viewed pictures containing an object-focus alternative and a verb-focus alternative. We found that both L2 groups showed delayed eye movements to the alternative of focus, which was different from the native speakers of English. Moreover, Dutch learners of English were even slower than Cantonese learners of English in directing fixations to the alternative of focus. We interpreted the delayed fixation patterns in both L2 groups as evidence of difficulties in integrating multiple interfaces in real time. Furthermore, the similarity between English and Dutch in the use of prosody to mark focus hindered Dutch learners' L2 processing of focus, whereas the difference between English and Cantonese in the realization of focus facilitated Cantonese learners' processing of focus in English.
AB - This visual-world eye-tracking study investigated the processing of focus in English sentences with preverbal only by L2 learners whose L1 was either Cantonese or Dutch, compared to native speakers of English. Participants heard only-sentences with prosodic prominence either on the object or on the verb and viewed pictures containing an object-focus alternative and a verb-focus alternative. We found that both L2 groups showed delayed eye movements to the alternative of focus, which was different from the native speakers of English. Moreover, Dutch learners of English were even slower than Cantonese learners of English in directing fixations to the alternative of focus. We interpreted the delayed fixation patterns in both L2 groups as evidence of difficulties in integrating multiple interfaces in real time. Furthermore, the similarity between English and Dutch in the use of prosody to mark focus hindered Dutch learners' L2 processing of focus, whereas the difference between English and Cantonese in the realization of focus facilitated Cantonese learners' processing of focus in English.
KW - Cantonese learners of English
KW - Dutch learners of English
KW - L2 processing
KW - focus
KW - visual world eye tracking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107994772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0142716421000230
DO - 10.1017/S0142716421000230
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107994772
SN - 0142-7164
VL - 42
SP - 1057
EP - 1088
JO - Applied Psycholinguistics
JF - Applied Psycholinguistics
IS - 4
ER -