TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-analysis of T peak –T end and T peak –T end /QT ratio for risk stratification in congenital long QT syndrome
AU - Tse, Gary
AU - Gong, Mengqi
AU - Meng, Lei
AU - Wong, Cheuk Wai
AU - Georgopoulos, Stamatis
AU - Bazoukis, George
AU - Wong, Martin C.S.
AU - Letsas, Konstantinos P.
AU - Vassiliou, Vassilios S.
AU - Xia, Yunlong
AU - Baranchuk, Adrian M.
AU - Yan, Gan Xin
AU - Liu, Tong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Background and objectives: Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) predisposes affected individuals to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VF/VF), potentially resulting in sudden cardiac death. The T peak –T end interval and the T peak –T end /QT ratio, electrocardiographic markers of dispersion of ventricular repolarization, were proposed for risk stratification but their predictive values in LQTS have been controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the value of T peak –T end intervals and T peak –T end /QT ratios in predicting arrhythmic and mortality outcomes in congenital LQTS. Method: PubMed and Embase databases were searched until 9th May 2017, identifying 199 studies. Results: Five studies on long QT syndrome were included in the final meta-analysis. T peak –T end intervals were longer (mean difference [MD]: 13 ms, standard error [SE]: 4 ms, P = 0.002; I 2 = 34%) in congenital LQTS patients with adverse events [syncope, ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death] compared to LQTS patients without such events. By contrast, T peak –T end /QT ratios were not significantly different between the two groups (MD: 0.02, SE: 0.02, P = 0.26; I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that T peak –T end interval is significant higher in individuals who are at elevated risk of adverse events in congenital LQTS, offering incremental value for risk stratification.
AB - Background and objectives: Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) predisposes affected individuals to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VF/VF), potentially resulting in sudden cardiac death. The T peak –T end interval and the T peak –T end /QT ratio, electrocardiographic markers of dispersion of ventricular repolarization, were proposed for risk stratification but their predictive values in LQTS have been controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the value of T peak –T end intervals and T peak –T end /QT ratios in predicting arrhythmic and mortality outcomes in congenital LQTS. Method: PubMed and Embase databases were searched until 9th May 2017, identifying 199 studies. Results: Five studies on long QT syndrome were included in the final meta-analysis. T peak –T end intervals were longer (mean difference [MD]: 13 ms, standard error [SE]: 4 ms, P = 0.002; I 2 = 34%) in congenital LQTS patients with adverse events [syncope, ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death] compared to LQTS patients without such events. By contrast, T peak –T end /QT ratios were not significantly different between the two groups (MD: 0.02, SE: 0.02, P = 0.26; I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that T peak –T end interval is significant higher in individuals who are at elevated risk of adverse events in congenital LQTS, offering incremental value for risk stratification.
KW - Dispersion of repolarization
KW - Risk stratification
KW - Sudden cardiac death
KW - Tpeak–Tend
KW - Tpeak–Tend/QT
KW - Ventricular arrhythmia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043531460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.03.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 29550106
AN - SCOPUS:85043531460
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 51
SP - 396
EP - 401
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
IS - 3
ER -