TY - JOUR
T1 - HRM’s financial value from obtaining more star performers
AU - Joo, Harry
AU - Aguinis, Herman
AU - Lee, Joowon
AU - Kremer, Hannah
AU - Villamor, Isabel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We assessed the financial value of human resource management (HRM) as a function of obtaining more star performers. Specifically, we implemented utility analysis procedures on 206 samples of individual performance (i.e. output) encompassing 824,924 workers. We found that HRM adds greater financial value by obtaining more stars. Our results also offer several specific contributions to HRM theory. First, regarding how HRM produces greater value by obtaining more stars, our evidence points to a nonlinear model of HRM’s value, where HRM generates significant yet diminishing returns by increasingly obtaining the most productive ones. Second, regarding when, our results show that diminishing returns from HRM are stronger when output differences among top stars are relatively small. Third, regarding why, our study explains that small output differences among top stars may create various costs which diminish the returns from obtaining the most productive stars. Our explanation of HRM’s nonlinear pattern contributes to the star literature by helping integrate a variety of specific explanations for stars’ curvilinear influence discussed in past research. Regarding HRM practices, we highlight the need to use utility analysis procedures that more fully consider the existence of stars. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1948890.
AB - We assessed the financial value of human resource management (HRM) as a function of obtaining more star performers. Specifically, we implemented utility analysis procedures on 206 samples of individual performance (i.e. output) encompassing 824,924 workers. We found that HRM adds greater financial value by obtaining more stars. Our results also offer several specific contributions to HRM theory. First, regarding how HRM produces greater value by obtaining more stars, our evidence points to a nonlinear model of HRM’s value, where HRM generates significant yet diminishing returns by increasingly obtaining the most productive ones. Second, regarding when, our results show that diminishing returns from HRM are stronger when output differences among top stars are relatively small. Third, regarding why, our study explains that small output differences among top stars may create various costs which diminish the returns from obtaining the most productive stars. Our explanation of HRM’s nonlinear pattern contributes to the star literature by helping integrate a variety of specific explanations for stars’ curvilinear influence discussed in past research. Regarding HRM practices, we highlight the need to use utility analysis procedures that more fully consider the existence of stars. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1948890.
KW - Star performers
KW - individual performance
KW - normality assumption
KW - utility analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112076033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2021.1948890
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2021.1948890
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112076033
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 33
SP - 4179
EP - 4214
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 21
ER -