TY - JOUR
T1 - Greening of grey and murky harbours
T2 - enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem functioning on artificial shorelines
AU - Bradford, Thea E.
AU - Astudillo, Juan Carlos
AU - Lai, Charlene
AU - Leung, Rainbow W.S.
AU - Minuti, Jay J.
AU - Hawkins, Stephen
AU - Morris, Rebecca L.
AU - Chan, Janet K.Y.
AU - Leung, Kenneth Mei Yee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Shoreline armouring in coastal cities can cause habitat degradation and biodiversity loss, often exacerbated by common anthropogenic stressors. Boulders are used as riprap to create revetments walls; but the homogenous surface and absence of shelter reduces intertidal biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Eco-engineering can mitigate habitat loss through the addition of water retention and other microhabitats. We deployed four eco-engineered designs in a degraded harbour riprap for 18 months. Two units with site-specific designs combined multiple microhabitat types, attracting the highest species diversity. All four designs generally increased within-site β diversity and fish diversity compared to nearby unmanipulated ripraps. Suspension-feeding species and more species within key functional groups colonised eco-engineered units at patch and site scale. Tailored, site-specific eco-engineering shows great potential to rehabilitate degraded ripraps into functional, novel ecosystems. Combining eco-engineering with anthropogenic stress reduction to enable recovery can enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in coastal cities.
AB - Shoreline armouring in coastal cities can cause habitat degradation and biodiversity loss, often exacerbated by common anthropogenic stressors. Boulders are used as riprap to create revetments walls; but the homogenous surface and absence of shelter reduces intertidal biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Eco-engineering can mitigate habitat loss through the addition of water retention and other microhabitats. We deployed four eco-engineered designs in a degraded harbour riprap for 18 months. Two units with site-specific designs combined multiple microhabitat types, attracting the highest species diversity. All four designs generally increased within-site β diversity and fish diversity compared to nearby unmanipulated ripraps. Suspension-feeding species and more species within key functional groups colonised eco-engineered units at patch and site scale. Tailored, site-specific eco-engineering shows great potential to rehabilitate degraded ripraps into functional, novel ecosystems. Combining eco-engineering with anthropogenic stress reduction to enable recovery can enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in coastal cities.
KW - Conservation and restoration
KW - Eco-engineering
KW - Intertidal ecology
KW - Marine infrastructure
KW - Shoreline hardening
KW - Sustainable cities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003153508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117961
DO - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117961
M3 - Article
C2 - 40286409
AN - SCOPUS:105003153508
SN - 0025-326X
VL - 216
JO - Marine Pollution Bulletin
JF - Marine Pollution Bulletin
M1 - 117961
ER -