TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender discrimination in China
T2 - Experimental evidence from the job market for college graduates
AU - Zhang, Jian
AU - Jin, Songqing
AU - Li, Tao
AU - Wang, Haigang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association for Comparative Economic Studies
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - This paper examines employment-related gender discrimination during the initial stages of a hiring process. It specifically focuses on recent college graduates in China. By examining firms’ responses to fictitious resumes with randomly generated information on gender and other key attributes of applicants (e.g., school reputation, student's academic achievement, and leadership experiences), this study is able to separate the effect of gender on a student's potential for getting an on-site interview from the confounding effects of other factors. The findings reveal that, with all other factors remaining constant, female applicants, on average, are less likely to be invited by hiring firms to on-site interviews as compared with their male counterparts. Furthermore, gender discrimination in computer and mathematics, architecture and engineering, and sales occupations appears to be driving the results of this study. The qualitative evidence based on interviews with firm recruiters suggests that the findings of this study are generally consistent with the role congruity theory of prejudice in psychology literature. While the finding that the quality of a job candidate (academic achievement and leadership experience) does not reduce gender discrimination offers some evidence to support a taste-based discrimination view, we do not have enough evidence to support a statistical discrimination view.
AB - This paper examines employment-related gender discrimination during the initial stages of a hiring process. It specifically focuses on recent college graduates in China. By examining firms’ responses to fictitious resumes with randomly generated information on gender and other key attributes of applicants (e.g., school reputation, student's academic achievement, and leadership experiences), this study is able to separate the effect of gender on a student's potential for getting an on-site interview from the confounding effects of other factors. The findings reveal that, with all other factors remaining constant, female applicants, on average, are less likely to be invited by hiring firms to on-site interviews as compared with their male counterparts. Furthermore, gender discrimination in computer and mathematics, architecture and engineering, and sales occupations appears to be driving the results of this study. The qualitative evidence based on interviews with firm recruiters suggests that the findings of this study are generally consistent with the role congruity theory of prejudice in psychology literature. While the finding that the quality of a job candidate (academic achievement and leadership experience) does not reduce gender discrimination offers some evidence to support a taste-based discrimination view, we do not have enough evidence to support a statistical discrimination view.
KW - China
KW - College graduates’ job market
KW - Correspondence method
KW - Gender discrimination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099964951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jce.2021.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jce.2021.01.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099964951
SN - 0147-5967
VL - 49
SP - 819
EP - 835
JO - Journal of Comparative Economics
JF - Journal of Comparative Economics
IS - 3
ER -