TY - JOUR
T1 - Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for left ventricular function in patients with heart failure
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Qi, Zuo
AU - Zheng, Yi
AU - Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
AU - Tse, Gary
AU - Liu, Tong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Aims: To evaluate the effect of exercise rehabilitation on the left ventricular (LV) function in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched until May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing data on changes in LV function, comparing exercise to no-exercise controls with HF of any type, were included. Results: A total of 16 studies including 1443 participants were included. LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was significantly improved in the exercise group [mean differences (MD), −2.67; 95 % confidence interval (CI) (−4.88, −0.46); P=0.02], but left atrial volume index (LAVI), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), E/e′ E/A, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV mass were unaltered compared to the non-exercise group. High intensity interval training (HIIT) or with moderate exercise (MT) led to improvement in LVEDD [MD, 3.62; 95 %CI (2.55, 4.69); P<0.00001], but not LAVI, E/e′ and E/A. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the location, the type of HF and study duration may be the source of heterogeneity in LVEF. Age appears to be a source of heterogeneity in EDV and ESV. The Egger test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: Exercise can partially improve LV function in patients with HF, with improvements appearing to be dependent on study quality, the type of HF, and race. However, there are some indicators that do not seem to improve or are even worse than the control group. Among all exercise modalities, HIIT shows the greatest benefit for HF patients.
AB - Aims: To evaluate the effect of exercise rehabilitation on the left ventricular (LV) function in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched until May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing data on changes in LV function, comparing exercise to no-exercise controls with HF of any type, were included. Results: A total of 16 studies including 1443 participants were included. LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was significantly improved in the exercise group [mean differences (MD), −2.67; 95 % confidence interval (CI) (−4.88, −0.46); P=0.02], but left atrial volume index (LAVI), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), E/e′ E/A, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV mass were unaltered compared to the non-exercise group. High intensity interval training (HIIT) or with moderate exercise (MT) led to improvement in LVEDD [MD, 3.62; 95 %CI (2.55, 4.69); P<0.00001], but not LAVI, E/e′ and E/A. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the location, the type of HF and study duration may be the source of heterogeneity in LVEF. Age appears to be a source of heterogeneity in EDV and ESV. The Egger test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: Exercise can partially improve LV function in patients with HF, with improvements appearing to be dependent on study quality, the type of HF, and race. However, there are some indicators that do not seem to improve or are even worse than the control group. Among all exercise modalities, HIIT shows the greatest benefit for HF patients.
KW - Exercise rehabilitation
KW - Heart failure
KW - High intensity interval training
KW - Left ventricular function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181671100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102210
DO - 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102210
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37993005
AN - SCOPUS:85181671100
SN - 0146-2806
VL - 49
JO - Current Problems in Cardiology
JF - Current Problems in Cardiology
IS - 2
M1 - 102210
ER -