Evaluation of the robustness of the polynomial segment models to noisy environments with unsupervised adaptation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently, the polynomial segment models (PSMs) have been shown to be a competitive alternative to the HMM in large vocabulary continuous recognition task [Li, C., Siu, M., Au-yeung, S., 2006. Recursive likelihood evaluation and fast search algorithm for polynomial segment model with application to speech recognition. IEEE Trans. on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 14, 1704-1708]. Its more constrained nature raises the issue of robustness under environmental mis-matches. In this paper, we examine the robustness properties of PSMs using the Aurora 4 corpus under both clean training and multi-conditional training. In addition, we generalize two unsupervised model adaptation schemes, namely, the maximum likelihood linear regression (MLLR) and reference speaker weighting (RSW), to be applicable for PSMs and explore their effectiveness in PSM environmental adaptation. Our experiments showed that although the word error rate differences between PSMs and HMMs became smaller under noisy test environments than under clean test environment, PSMs were still competitive under mis-match conditions. After model adaptation, especially with the RSW adaptation, the word error rates were reduced for both HMMs and PSMs. The best word error rate was obtained with RSW-adapted PSMs by rescoring lattices generated with the adapted HMMs. Overall, with model adaptation, the recognition word error rate can be reduced by more than 20%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-781
Number of pages13
JournalSpeech Communication
Volume50
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Aurora 4
  • Polynomial segment models
  • Robustness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the robustness of the polynomial segment models to noisy environments with unsupervised adaptation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this