Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Entrepreneurs' Networking Styles and Normative Underpinnings during Institutional Transition

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Existing network research has mainly adopted functional and/or structural approaches to study the instrumental goals behind entrepreneurs' networking as well as the influence of personal position on access to resources and eventual performance. The variety of entrepreneurs' networking styles and their normative underpinnings have not been adequately explored. Contextualized in China, this study asks: How do entrepreneurs' understandings of social norms shape their networking styles? Through an inductive comparison of two entrepreneur generations in China, we identify three networking styles: guanxi-oriented networking, market-based networking, and mixed networking. We theorize that three types of norms shape these styles: market-inferred norms, dyadically formed norms, and identity-induced norms. This study provides new insights into the understanding of Chinese entrepreneurs' distinctive networking styles and their normative underpinnings. Further, it suggests implications both for the wider study of entrepreneurs' networking behaviors in transition economies, and for practitioners wishing to enhance their network building in China.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-489
Number of pages33
JournalEntrepreneurship Research Journal
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Chinese entrepreneurs
  • guanxi
  • institutional transition
  • networking
  • norms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Entrepreneurs' Networking Styles and Normative Underpinnings during Institutional Transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this