Enterococcal intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: Management and outcome of 61 consecutive cases

Enterococci are an increasingly important cause of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but the evidence base for treating such cases is limited. Successful antimicrobial treatment of CRBSI while leaving the central venous catheter (CVC) in situ has been reported for some bacteria, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, but the effectiveness of this approach for treating enterococcal CRBSI is unknown. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of treatment options for enterococcal CRBSI and whether CVC removal is mandatory. Treatment and outcome was determined in a 3 year cohort of patients with enterococcal CRBSI from a university teaching hospital. All episodes of enterococcal bacteraemia during the study (n = 268) were examined to identify the cohort of 61 CRBSIs. Outcomes were determined for various antimicrobial regimens with or without CVC removal. Forty-eight episodes were managed with CVC removal and 13 were managed with the CVC in situ. Forty of 48 (83%) and five of 13 (38%) episodes were cured with the CVC removed or left in situ, respectively. All five episodes cured with the CVC in situ were treated with a cell wall-acting antimicrobial plus an aminoglycoside. This antimicrobial combination was significantly more effective than either ampicillin or vancomycin monotherapy (P < 0.05), or antimicrobials to which isolates were not susceptible (P < 0.01) when the CVC remained in situ. We conclude that enterococcal CRBSI can be treated successfully without CVC removal. The combination of a cell wall-acting antimicrobial with an amino-glycoside was the most effective regimen when the CVC remained in situ in this small group of patients. Although CVC removal was associated with a high cure rate, it did not guarantee treatment success.