Abstract
Although most economists defend the positive role of foreign investors in tourism development, a number of tourism geography studies present divergent views on the local impact of foreign investment on host communities. To trace the issue to its root, a simple analytical framework has been developed to show that the effects of free capital mobility highly depend on the geographical size and degree of economic diversity of a tourism destination. In the case of a small tourism economy, liberal economic doctrines tend to shape host communities' policy-making towards a higher degree of openness to foreign factors of production than is optimal. Therefore, policymakers should develop foreign investment policies based on a careful assessment of tourism's impacts and bear in mind the need for sustainable development. Data and facts from Macao and Hong Kong lend support to our theoretical predications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-254 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Ekonomista |
| Volume | 2019-January |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Capital inflow
- Foreign expansion
- Hong Kong
- Local underinvestment
- Macao
- Tourism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of foreign capital on tourism: Evidence from Macao and Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver