Conceptualizing psychological resilience through resting-state functional MRI in a mentally healthy population: a systematic review

Alan P.L. Tai, Mei Kei Leung, Xiujuan Geng, Way K.W. Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conceptualizations and operational definitions of psychological resilience vary across resilience neuroimaging studies. Data on the neural features of resilience among healthy individuals has been scarce. Furthermore, findings from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies were inconsistent across studies. This systematic review summarized resting-state fMRI findings in different modalities from various operationally defined resilience in a mentally healthy population. The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched. Articles that focused on resting-state fMRI in relation to resilience, and published before 2022, were targeted. Orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula and amygdala, were reported the most from the 19 included studies. Regions in emotional network was reported the most from the included studies. The involvement of regions like amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex indicated the relationships between emotional processing and resilience. No common brain regions or neural pathways were identified across studies. The emotional network appears to be studied the most in association with resilience. Matching fMRI modalities and operational definitions of resilience across studies are essential for meta-analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1175064
JournalFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
  • healthy population
  • neural mechanisms
  • operational definitions of resilience
  • psychological resilience
  • resting-state

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualizing psychological resilience through resting-state functional MRI in a mentally healthy population: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this