Comparing the Performance of Published Risk Scores in Brugada Syndrome: A Multi-center Cohort Study

Sharen Lee, Jiandong Zhou, Cheuk To Chung, Rebecca On Yu Lee, George Bazoukis, Konstantinos P. Letsas, Wing Tak Wong, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Ngai Shing Mok, Tong Liu, Qingpeng Zhang, Gary Tse

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The management of Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients at intermediate risk of arrhythmic events remains controversial. The present study evaluated the predictive performance of different risk scores in an Asian BrS population and its intermediate risk subgroup. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS from January 1, 1997 to June 20, 2020 from Hong Kong. The primary outcome is sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Two novel risk risk scores and 7 machine learning-based models (random survival forest, Ada boost classifier, Gaussian naïve Bayes, light gradient boosting machine, random forest classifier, gradient boosting classifier and decision tree classifier) were developed. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) [95% confidence intervals] was compared between the different models. This study included 548 consecutive BrS patients (7% female, age at diagnosis: 50 ± 16 years, follow-up: 84 ± 55 months). For the whole cohort, the score developed by Sieira et al showed the best performance (AUC: 0.806 [0.747-0.865]). A novel risk score was developed using the Sieira score and additional variables significant on univariable Cox regression (AUC: 0.855 [0.808-0.901]). A simpler score based on non-invasive results only showed a statistically comparable AUC (0.784 [0.724-0.845]), improved using random survival forests (AUC: 0.942 [0.913-0.964]). For the intermediate risk subgroup (N = 274), a gradient boosting classifier model showed the best performance (AUC: 0.814 [0.791-0.832]). A simple risk score based on clinical and electrocardiographic variables showed a good performance for predicting VT/VF, improved using machine learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101381
JournalCurrent Problems in Cardiology
Volume47
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the Performance of Published Risk Scores in Brugada Syndrome: A Multi-center Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this