TY - CHAP
T1 - Cantonese GIVE and Double-Object Construction Grammaticalization and word order change
AU - Chin, Andy Chi On
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - GIVE is a versatile morpheme in many languages. Syntactically, it is a verb that subcategorizes two objects, and the three-argument structure gives rise to a number of constructions with inter-related meanings as a result of grammaticalization and semantic extension of GIVE. The constructions that have been discussed the most include the double-object construction, the causative construction, and the passive construction. While there have been extensive studies on the interplay between the syntax and semantics of GIVE in many languages (see, for example, Newman, 1996, 1998), not much has been done in a similar manner on Cantonese, a member ofthe Yue dialect group of the Chinese language family. This monograph reports on the study of the morpheme GIVE and its associated functions and syntactic constructions in Cantonese from diachronic, synchronic, and typological perspectives. Drawing on cross-linguistic data, and 19th century dialect materials, this study first traces the chronological development of the various functions played by GIVE in Cantonese: The indirect object marker, the passive marker, and the instrument marker which was relatively under-explored in previous studies. The study then examines the double-object construction in terms of its typological contrast between the Northern and Southern dialects of Chinese with fieldwork data and corpus data. The typological contrast provides the basis for discussing the use of the northern pattern in Cantonese as a result of the increasing influence of Putonghua and Modern Standard Chinese. The extent and the rate of the influence were studied by means of a sociolinguistic survey with 40 native speakers of Cantonese.
AB - GIVE is a versatile morpheme in many languages. Syntactically, it is a verb that subcategorizes two objects, and the three-argument structure gives rise to a number of constructions with inter-related meanings as a result of grammaticalization and semantic extension of GIVE. The constructions that have been discussed the most include the double-object construction, the causative construction, and the passive construction. While there have been extensive studies on the interplay between the syntax and semantics of GIVE in many languages (see, for example, Newman, 1996, 1998), not much has been done in a similar manner on Cantonese, a member ofthe Yue dialect group of the Chinese language family. This monograph reports on the study of the morpheme GIVE and its associated functions and syntactic constructions in Cantonese from diachronic, synchronic, and typological perspectives. Drawing on cross-linguistic data, and 19th century dialect materials, this study first traces the chronological development of the various functions played by GIVE in Cantonese: The indirect object marker, the passive marker, and the instrument marker which was relatively under-explored in previous studies. The study then examines the double-object construction in terms of its typological contrast between the Northern and Southern dialects of Chinese with fieldwork data and corpus data. The typological contrast provides the basis for discussing the use of the northern pattern in Cantonese as a result of the increasing influence of Putonghua and Modern Standard Chinese. The extent and the rate of the influence were studied by means of a sociolinguistic survey with 40 native speakers of Cantonese.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132244744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85132244744
T3 - Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse
SP - 1
EP - 277
BT - Cantonese GIVE and Double-Object Construction
ER -