Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are cleft sentence structures more difficult to process?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the processing of cleft structures against that of monoclausal sentences using event-related potential (ERP). We aim to understand how syntactic complexity is processed by comparing the neural response to cleft and single-clause sentences with identical verb phrases, controlling for verb bias frequency effects. Sixty participants were tested, and we presented 100 cleft and 100 monoclausal sentences, balanced for active and passive verb usage. We examined the P600 component, an ERP associated with syntactic complexity, to assess the processing of cleft structures. Results showed that cleft structures incur a greater processing load, as indicated by a larger P600, compared to monoclausal sentences. The P600 response indicates that processing cleft sentences requires additional syntactic operations, consistent with behavioral studies showing that clinical populations have difficulty comprehending complex sentences.
Original languageEnglish
Article number138029
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume843
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  3. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • EEG
  • ERP
  • cleft
  • sentence processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are cleft sentence structures more difficult to process?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this