TY - GEN
T1 - Applying the semantic graph approach to automatic essay scoring
AU - Lo, Chak Shing
AU - Au, Oliver
AU - Tong, Bruce Kwong Bun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Frequent quizzes are used to motivate students to study throughout the academic term instead of waiting until just before the examination. Teachers have been relying on the use of multiple-choice questions to reduce their grading effort. We have developed a tool that grades answers of essay questions automatically. The tool should be a welcome addition to a teacher’s arsenal for quiz preparation. The teacher will provide the model answer of an essay question. Incorporating some heuristics into the Stanford Parser, our tool recognizes the parts of speech of each word and creates a parse tree from each sentence. It builds a semantic graph from the sentences in the model answer. The graph uses nodes to represent words and phrases. A directed arc connects two nodes to represent a relation. Currently, four types of arcs are used: attribute, possession, classification and action. In the same way, our tool determines the semantic graph of the student answer. Our tool compares the graph of the model answer with the graph of the student answer. It calculates a score to reflect their similarity. The relative weights of nodes and arcs are adjustable. WordNet helps us to identify synonyms so that the two answers need not be using the same wording to be considered similar. Our tool has some limitations. First, our semantic graph cannot handle timing sequences, for example, “event A happens before event B”. Second, our graph cannot handle conditional knowledge like “if X, then Y”. In the future, we may be able to introduce new arc types to address these limitations. Our prototype is not yet ready to replace the grading performed by teachers in formal assessment. But it may be useful to allow students to check their understanding during their self-study.
AB - Frequent quizzes are used to motivate students to study throughout the academic term instead of waiting until just before the examination. Teachers have been relying on the use of multiple-choice questions to reduce their grading effort. We have developed a tool that grades answers of essay questions automatically. The tool should be a welcome addition to a teacher’s arsenal for quiz preparation. The teacher will provide the model answer of an essay question. Incorporating some heuristics into the Stanford Parser, our tool recognizes the parts of speech of each word and creates a parse tree from each sentence. It builds a semantic graph from the sentences in the model answer. The graph uses nodes to represent words and phrases. A directed arc connects two nodes to represent a relation. Currently, four types of arcs are used: attribute, possession, classification and action. In the same way, our tool determines the semantic graph of the student answer. Our tool compares the graph of the model answer with the graph of the student answer. It calculates a score to reflect their similarity. The relative weights of nodes and arcs are adjustable. WordNet helps us to identify synonyms so that the two answers need not be using the same wording to be considered similar. Our tool has some limitations. First, our semantic graph cannot handle timing sequences, for example, “event A happens before event B”. Second, our graph cannot handle conditional knowledge like “if X, then Y”. In the future, we may be able to introduce new arc types to address these limitations. Our prototype is not yet ready to replace the grading performed by teachers in formal assessment. But it may be useful to allow students to check their understanding during their self-study.
KW - Automatic essay scoring
KW - Knowledge network
KW - Semantic graph
KW - Text clustering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952815237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_24
DO - 10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_24
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84952815237
SN - 9783662489772
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 263
EP - 275
BT - Technology in Education
A2 - Wong, Tak Lam
A2 - Lam, Jeanne
A2 - Ng, Kwan Keung
A2 - Wang, Fu Lee
A2 - Cheung, Simon K.S.
A2 - Li, Kam Cheong
T2 - 2nd International Conference on Technology in Education: Technology-Mediated Proactive Learning, ICTE 2015
Y2 - 2 July 2015 through 4 July 2015
ER -