Analysis, evaluation, and comparison of algorithms for scheduling task graphs on parallel processors

Ishfaq Ahmad, Yu Kwong Kwok, Min You Wu

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we survey algorithms that allocate a parallel program represented by an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph (DAG), also called a task graph or macro-dataflow graph, to a set of homogeneous processors, with the objective of minimizing the completion time. We analyze 21 such algorithms and classify them into four groups. The first group includes algorithms that schedule the DAG to a bounded number of processors directly. These algorithms are called the bounded number of processors (BNP) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the second group schedule the DAG to an unbounded number of clusters and are called the unbounded number of clusters (UNC) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the third group schedule the DAG using task duplication and are called the task duplication based (TDB) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the fourth group perform allocation and mapping on arbitrary processor network topologies. These algorithms are called the arbitrary processor network (APN) scheduling algorithms. The design philosophies and principles behind these algorithms are discussed, and the performance of all of the algorithms is evaluated and compared against each other on a unified basis by using various scheduling parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages207-213
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1996 2nd International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks, I-SPAN - Beijing, China
Duration: 12 Jun 199614 Jun 1996

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1996 2nd International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks, I-SPAN
CityBeijing, China
Period12/06/9614/06/96

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis, evaluation, and comparison of algorithms for scheduling task graphs on parallel processors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this