TY - GEN
T1 - An Analytical Study on Toy Age Grading Methods
T2 - 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering-Asia, ISPCE-AS 2024
AU - Au, Shui Lun
AU - Mak, S. L.
AU - Tang, W. F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This research delves into the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Machine Learning (ML) in age grading assessments within the toy industry. It compares the efficacy of these methodologies in establishing suitable age ranges for toys, a critical aspect for ensuring child safety and compliance with regulations. LLMs, harnessing pretrained models, enable swift evaluations through visual and textual inputs, yielding instant results with minimal human intervention. Conversely, ML models necessitate training on labeled datasets to gauge age appropriateness, presenting opportunities for ongoing improvement with updated data. A comparative analysis between a trained ML model and GPT 3.5 Turbo unveiled differ accuracies and readiness in age grading assessments. While LLMs offer rapid insights, ML models shine in scalability and the refinement of accuracy over time. The study's findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach, proposing customized applications for stakeholders in the toy safety and development domain based on their distinct requirements and resources.
AB - This research delves into the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Machine Learning (ML) in age grading assessments within the toy industry. It compares the efficacy of these methodologies in establishing suitable age ranges for toys, a critical aspect for ensuring child safety and compliance with regulations. LLMs, harnessing pretrained models, enable swift evaluations through visual and textual inputs, yielding instant results with minimal human intervention. Conversely, ML models necessitate training on labeled datasets to gauge age appropriateness, presenting opportunities for ongoing improvement with updated data. A comparative analysis between a trained ML model and GPT 3.5 Turbo unveiled differ accuracies and readiness in age grading assessments. While LLMs offer rapid insights, ML models shine in scalability and the refinement of accuracy over time. The study's findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach, proposing customized applications for stakeholders in the toy safety and development domain based on their distinct requirements and resources.
KW - Age Grading
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Large Language Model
KW - Machine Learning
KW - toys
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212286161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISPCE-ASIA64773.2024.10756265
DO - 10.1109/ISPCE-ASIA64773.2024.10756265
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85212286161
T3 - ISPCE-AS 2024 - IEEE International Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering-Asia 2024
BT - ISPCE-AS 2024 - IEEE International Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering-Asia 2024
Y2 - 25 October 2024 through 27 October 2024
ER -