TY - GEN
T1 - A Unified Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection for Autonomous Driving Systems
AU - Li, Xiangyu
AU - Zhang, Jingyu
AU - Keung, Jacky
AU - Ma, Xiaoxue
AU - Liao, Yihan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2026/6/25
Y1 - 2026/6/25
N2 - Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) can fail when they encounter inputs that differ from their training data, known as out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions. Such OOD inputs lead ADS to make incorrect driving decisions, resulting in serious safety risks. Reliable OOD detection is therefore essential for enhancing system robustness and preventing hazardous behavior. However, existing literature in the autonomous driving field examines a relatively narrow scope of OOD detectors (e.g., reconstruction-based only) under limited OOD conditions. To address these limitations, we present a unified benchmark that evaluates nine widely used OOD detectors on both simulated and real-world driving images. Specifically, we assess detectors from four families: reconstruction-based, density-based, distance-based, and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based. To examine generalization ability, we propose an automated evaluation pipeline with statistical analysis that evaluates OOD detectors by automatically generating OOD samples (three weather transformations and four adversarial attacks) and assessing them based on both effectiveness (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1 scores at five threshold values) and efficiency (inference time). Our experiments reveal that distance-based detectors consistently deliver the highest overall performance and robustness across datasets and all OOD scenarios, followed closely by density-based detectors. In contrast, reconstruction-based and GAN-based methods exhibit greater performance fluctuations and reduced reliability under adversarial and complex perturbations. These findings suggest that OOD detection in autonomous driving benefits most from methods that leverage feature-space distance or probabilistic density estimation, as they capture intrinsic data distribution properties more effectively. Overall, our work guides the selection of OOD detectors for real-world ADS deployment and emphasizes the importance of robustness, generalization, and inference efficiency. Our implementation is available at this link.
AB - Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) can fail when they encounter inputs that differ from their training data, known as out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions. Such OOD inputs lead ADS to make incorrect driving decisions, resulting in serious safety risks. Reliable OOD detection is therefore essential for enhancing system robustness and preventing hazardous behavior. However, existing literature in the autonomous driving field examines a relatively narrow scope of OOD detectors (e.g., reconstruction-based only) under limited OOD conditions. To address these limitations, we present a unified benchmark that evaluates nine widely used OOD detectors on both simulated and real-world driving images. Specifically, we assess detectors from four families: reconstruction-based, density-based, distance-based, and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based. To examine generalization ability, we propose an automated evaluation pipeline with statistical analysis that evaluates OOD detectors by automatically generating OOD samples (three weather transformations and four adversarial attacks) and assessing them based on both effectiveness (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1 scores at five threshold values) and efficiency (inference time). Our experiments reveal that distance-based detectors consistently deliver the highest overall performance and robustness across datasets and all OOD scenarios, followed closely by density-based detectors. In contrast, reconstruction-based and GAN-based methods exhibit greater performance fluctuations and reduced reliability under adversarial and complex perturbations. These findings suggest that OOD detection in autonomous driving benefits most from methods that leverage feature-space distance or probabilistic density estimation, as they capture intrinsic data distribution properties more effectively. Overall, our work guides the selection of OOD detectors for real-world ADS deployment and emphasizes the importance of robustness, generalization, and inference efficiency. Our implementation is available at this link.
KW - autonomous driving
KW - benchmarking
KW - machine learning systems.
KW - out-of-distribution detection
KW - software testing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044164723
U2 - 10.1145/3793654.3793758
DO - 10.1145/3793654.3793758
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105044164723
T3 - Proceedings - 2026 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test, AST 2026
SP - 146
EP - 157
BT - Proceedings - 2026 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test, AST 2026
T2 - 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test, AST 2026
Y2 - 13 April 2026 through 14 April 2026
ER -