Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multipath ad hoc routing approach to combat wireless link insecurity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As wireless LAN (WLAN) technologies proliferate, it is becoming common that ad hoc networks, in which mobile devices communicate via temporary links, are built using WLAN products. In the IEEE 802.11b standard, the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) scheme is used as the only measure to enhance data confidentiality against eavesdropping. However, owing to the well known pitfalls in Initialization Vector (IV) attachment in the ciphertext, the underlying 40-bit RC4 encryption mechanism in WEP is unsafe regardless of the key size. On the other hand, solutions involving replacement of RC4 by another cipher are not attractive because that may lead to reconstruction of the whole system and result in high costs as well as redevelopment of the products. In order to enhance the security on the existing development efforts, we propose a novel multipath routing approach to combat the link insecurity problem at a higher protocol layer. This approach does not require the application to use sophisticated encryption technologies that may be too heavy burdens for mobile devices. Based on our suggested confidentiality measurement model, we find that our proposed multipath ad hoc routing technique, called Secure Multipath Source Routing (SMSR), is highly effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)448-452
Number of pages5
JournalIEEE International Conference on Communications
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes
Event2003 International Conference on Communications (ICC 2003) - Anchorage, AK, United States
Duration: 11 May 2003 → 15 May 2003

Keywords

  • Confidentiality
  • Eaves-dropping
  • Multipath model
  • SMSR
  • WEP
  • Wireless ad hoc network

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multipath ad hoc routing approach to combat wireless link insecurity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this