A multidimensional approach to evaluating management journals: Refining pagerank via the differentiation of citation types and identifying the roles that management journals play

Brenda Cheang, Samuel Kai Wah Chu, Chongshou Li, Andrew Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, the authors introduce two citation-based approaches to facilitate a multidimensional evaluation of 39 selected management journals. The first is a refined application of PageRank via the differentiation of citation types. The second is a form of mathematical manipulation to identify the roles that the selected management journals play. Their findings reveal that Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, and Administrative Science Quarterly are the top three management journals, respectively. They also discovered that these three journals play the role of a knowledge hub in the domain. Finally, when compared with Journal Citation Reports (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA), their results closely match expert opinions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2581-2591
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume65
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • citation analysis
  • impact factor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multidimensional approach to evaluating management journals: Refining pagerank via the differentiation of citation types and identifying the roles that management journals play'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this